Non-Functional Requirements in Business Analysis

Image showing the title 'Non-Functional Requirements in Business Analysis' with a professional and abstract background design

Non-functional requirements are equally important as functional requirements in business analysis, even though they are often overlooked or considered secondary. While functional requirements specify what a system should do, non-functional requirements define how a system should behave and the quality attributes it must possess. In essence, non-functional requirements set the standards for the system’s performance, usability, reliability, security, and other quality factors that impact the overall user experience.

What are Non-Functional Requirements?

Non-functional requirements (NFRs) specify the criteria that a system must meet to ensure a satisfactory user experience and achieve business objectives. They focus on the quality attributes of the system, such as performance, security, scalability, usability, and maintainability. Unlike functional requirements, which define specific tasks and functions, non-functional requirements describe how the system should perform those tasks.

For example, a non-functional requirement for an online banking application might specify that the system should handle up to 10,000 concurrent users without performance degradation. Another non-functional requirement might state that the system should be available 99.9% of the time to ensure high availability.

Types of Non-Functional Requirements

Non-functional requirements can be categorized into several types, each focusing on a specific quality attribute of the system:

  1. Performance: Defines the speed, responsiveness, and stability of the system under different conditions. For example, the system should load pages within two seconds.
  2. Security: Specifies the measures required to protect data, prevent unauthorized access, and ensure user privacy. For example, the system should use two-factor authentication for all user logins.
  3. Usability: Describes how easy the system is to use and learn. For example, the system should have a user-friendly interface with clear navigation and intuitive design.
  4. Scalability: Outlines the system’s ability to handle growth in user base, data volume, and transactions. For example, the system should be able to scale horizontally to accommodate increasing traffic.
  5. Reliability: Ensures the system operates without failure over a specific period. For example, the system should have a mean time between failures (MTBF) of at least 10,000 hours.
  6. Maintainability: Describes the ease with which the system can be maintained, updated, and modified. For example, the system should allow for easy updates and patches without downtime.
  7. Compatibility: Specifies the system’s ability to work with other systems, platforms, or devices. For example, the system should be compatible with all major web browsers and mobile devices.

Importance of Non-Functional Requirements in Business Analysis

Non-functional requirements are crucial for several reasons:

  1. Enhancing User Experience: NFRs directly impact the user experience by defining the system’s quality attributes. A system that performs well, is secure, and is easy to use is more likely to be adopted and trusted by users.
  2. Mitigating Risks: NFRs help identify potential risks related to performance, security, and reliability early in the project lifecycle. By addressing these risks upfront, business analysts can prevent costly issues later in the project.
  3. Ensuring Compliance: Many industries have specific regulations and standards that systems must comply with. NFRs ensure that the system meets these regulatory requirements, avoiding legal and financial penalties.
  4. Supporting Business Goals: NFRs align the system’s quality attributes with the organization’s business goals. For example, a system with high availability and reliability can support a company’s goal of providing uninterrupted service to its customers.

Challenges in Defining Non-Functional Requirements

Defining non-functional requirements can be challenging for several reasons:

  1. Ambiguity and Vagueness: Unlike functional requirements, which are often straightforward and specific, non-functional requirements can be vague or ambiguous. For example, a requirement like “the system should be user-friendly” is open to interpretation and lacks measurable criteria.
  2. Lack of Stakeholder Awareness: Stakeholders may not always be aware of the importance of non-functional requirements, leading to insufficient attention or resources being allocated to them. Business analysts must educate stakeholders on the significance of NFRs and ensure they are adequately considered.
  3. Balancing Competing Priorities: Non-functional requirements can sometimes conflict with functional requirements or other NFRs. For example, improving system performance may require additional resources, which could impact cost and budget constraints.
  4. Difficulty in Measuring and Testing: Non-functional requirements are often more challenging to measure and test than functional requirements. For example, testing for scalability or reliability may require complex simulations and specialized tools.

Best Practices for Defining Non-Functional Requirements

To define non-functional requirements effectively, consider the following best practices:

  1. Engage Stakeholders: Involve stakeholders early in the process to gather their input and understand their expectations regarding the system’s quality attributes. Conduct workshops, interviews, and surveys to identify key NFRs.
  2. Use Specific and Measurable Criteria: Define NFRs using specific, measurable criteria that can be tested and validated. For example, instead of stating “the system should be fast,” specify “the system should respond to user actions within two seconds.”
  3. Prioritize NFRs: Work with stakeholders to prioritize NFRs based on their impact on the project’s goals, user needs, and business value. Focus on delivering the most critical NFRs first.
  4. Document NFRs Thoroughly: Use appropriate documentation techniques, such as requirements specifications or quality attribute scenarios, to capture NFRs in detail. Ensure that all NFRs are documented in a consistent format and stored in a centralized repository.
  5. Validate and Review NFRs Regularly: Regularly review and validate NFRs with stakeholders to ensure accuracy, completeness, and relevance. Make adjustments as needed to reflect changes in business needs or project scope.

Conclusion

Non-functional requirements are a vital component of any business analysis process. They define the quality attributes that a system must possess to provide a satisfactory user experience and achieve business objectives. By defining and managing non-functional requirements effectively, business analysts can ensure that the system meets the desired performance, security, usability, and other quality standards.

While defining non-functional requirements can be challenging, following best practices and using appropriate tools and techniques can help overcome these challenges and deliver successful projects that meet stakeholder needs.

🔗 Follow Examr to get updates on each new article!

References

  • Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., & Mylopoulos, J. (2000). Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Sommerville, I. (2016). Software Engineering. Pearson.
  • Kazman, R., Bass, L., & Abowd, G. (1994). Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  • Rozanski, N., & Woods, E. (2011). Software Systems Architecture: Working with Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  • Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2003). Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  • Pfleeger, S. L., & Atlee, J. M. (2010). Software Engineering: Theory and Practice. Prentice Hall.
  • McConnell, S. (1996). Rapid Development: Taming Wild Software Schedules. Microsoft Press.
  • Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. McGraw-Hill.
  • Bauer, A., & Pohl, K. (2015). Requirements Engineering Fundamentals. Rocky Nook.
  • Larman, C. (2004). Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition

Everything is more immersive on the new 7” Colorsoft display that reads like real paper.
Color that’s easy on the eyes pulls you in without distracting from the story.

Test Your Digital Product Management Skills!

Take our practice tests and quizzes to gauge your knowledge and boost your expertise in digital product management. Start now and see how you measure up!

Take

More Interesting Insights

Scroll to Top